Was this the most painful way to lose a no-hitter?
This browser does not support the video element.
Patrick Corbin was cruising on Tuesday night against the Giants. After giving up a walk to Joe Panik in the top of the fourth, the D-backs lefty sat down 13 batters in a row, never even facing so much as a three-ball count. He was four outs away from the first no-hitter of 2018. All he had to do was retire Brandon Belt and it was on to the ninth inning. Except, well:
Corbin threw a great slider, fooling Belt and resulting in a weak check-swing ... which just so happened to make contact and send a ground ball to the soft spot in Arizona's defensive shift. Just like that, a dribbler that almost always results in an out … didn't. His bid for immortality was over.
But, while the play above was brutal, was it the absolute worst possible way for a pitcher to lose a no-hitter? Baseball can confound in a zillion different ways, after all, and that's especially true when the margin for error is as small as a single hit.
With two outs in the ninth
While Corbin's fate was rough, at least it came in the eighth inning -- even if Belt had been retired, the Giants still would have had three more opportunities to spoil the party. Mike Mussina, on the other hand, got right up to the finish line:
You played yourself
I.e.: a play that the pitcher himself could have made. It's one thing to lose a no-hitter on weak contact, it's another for that weak contact to bounce right off your glove -- just ask Max Scherzer:
This browser does not support the video element.
That guy?!
For 7 2/3 innings on Sept. 9, 1993, the Braves pitching staff carved up the Padres' lineup, navigating solid pros like Derek Bell and Phil Clark without giving up so much as a hit. Surely they'd be able to handle Luis Lopez, right? Not only was the infielder making just his third career Major League start, but he'd go on to hit just .116/.114/.140 that season (OPS+: -33). Naturally, he singled up the middle off Mark Wohlers.
And that's far from the only time that the weakest hitter in a lineup has been the one to end a no-hitter. Cole Hamels -- yes, that Cole Hamels, the pitcher -- broke up R.A. Dickey's no-hit bid back in 2010:
This browser does not support the video element.
A bunt
First, a clarification: Bunting to break up a no-hitter late in a game that has already been decided is and should be frowned upon. But bunting to break up a no-hitter when it's still anyone's game? All's fair in love and baseball, as Justin Verlander discovered last June:
This browser does not support the video element.
Hey, a hit is a hit -- and Seattle eventually rallied to win the game, 7-5.
In extra innings
As a pitcher working on a no-hitter, the end of the ninth inning is the finish line, the shining light at the end of the tunnel. If you can make it there without allowing a hit, you've earned your place in baseball history. But MLB's official ruling on the matter is as follows: "An official no-hit game occurs when a pitcher (or pitchers) allows no hits during the entire course of a game." Put simply, if the game goes longer than nine innings, your no-hitter has to, too.
That was a problem for Rich Hill last year, who put up nine no-hit innings against the Pirates ... only to give up a walk-off homer to Josh Harrison in the bottom of the 10th:
This browser does not support the video element.
But not even that can touch Harvey Haddix, who in 1959 threw 12 perfect innings for the Pirates ... and still lost.
Now it's up to you: What is the very worst way that a pitcher can lose a no-hitter? Vote in the poll below: